Goolsby

Goolsby v. San Diego, County of

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20203:17-cv-00564California11,878 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 17cv564-WQH (NLS) THOMAS GOOLSBY, Plaintiff, REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION FOR

v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART

AND DENYING IN PART

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., [ECF No. 137] Defendants.

17 18 Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 137. For the reasons outlined below, the Court RECOMMENDS that the district judge GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff Thomas Goolsby (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claiming that Defendants violated his Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights stemming from his incarceration at the George Bailey Detention Facility and San Diego County Jail between December 12, 2016 and May 17, 2017. ECF No. 15 (Third Amended Complaint).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.