Certified Nutraceuticals Inc. v. The Clorox Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CERTIFIED NUTRACEUTICALS, Case No.: 18-cv-00744 W (KSC) INC. a California corporation,
ORDER:
Plaintiff, 13 v. DENYING DEFENDANT SARAH
QUADRI AND FATMA
THE CLOROX COMPANY, a BOUKHARI’S MOTION FOR Delaware Corporation; NEOCELL
ATTORNEY’S FEES [DOC. 56]
CORPORATION, a California Corporation; NEOCELL HOLDING 17 COMPANY, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; NUTRANEXT, a Delaware Corporation; AVICENNA
NUTRACEUTICAL,
LLC, a Georgia Limited Liability Company; and DOES 1 through 10, 21 inclusive, 22 Defendants. 23 Pending before the Court is Defendant Sarah Quadri and Fatma Boukarhi’s (collectively, “Individual Defendants”) motion for attorney’s fees. [Doc. 56.] The Court decides the matter without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion for attorney’s fees. // I. BACKGROUND This case was initially filed by the Plaintiff, Certified…