Certified Nutraceuticals Inc. v. The Clorox Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20203:18-cv-00744California1,330 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CERTIFIED NUTRACEUTICALS, Case No.: 18-cv-00744 W (KSC) INC. a California corporation,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 v. DENYING DEFENDANT SARAH

QUADRI AND FATMA

THE CLOROX COMPANY, a BOUKHARI’S MOTION FOR Delaware Corporation; NEOCELL

ATTORNEY’S FEES [DOC. 56]

CORPORATION, a California Corporation; NEOCELL HOLDING 17 COMPANY, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; NUTRANEXT, a Delaware Corporation; AVICENNA

NUTRACEUTICAL,

LLC, a Georgia Limited Liability Company; and DOES 1 through 10, 21 inclusive, 22 Defendants. 23 Pending before the Court is Defendant Sarah Quadri and Fatma Boukarhi’s (collectively, “Individual Defendants”) motion for attorney’s fees. [Doc. 56.] The Court decides the matter without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons that follow, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion for attorney’s fees. // I. BACKGROUND This case was initially filed by the Plaintiff, Certified…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.