Flowrider Surf, Ltd. v. Pacific Surf Designs, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20203:15-cv-01879California5,004 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

[FILED

FEB 5 2020

xy COERM WS, DISTR.CT.COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OTL. □□□□□ 5 6 : UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FLOWRIDER SURF, LTD., a Canadian Case No.: 3:15-cv-01879-BEN-BLM D corporation; and SURF WAVES, LTD., a company incorporated in the United ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 || Kingdom, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S Plaintiffs, RENEWED MOTION FOR

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

|v. . 16 || PACIFIC SURF DESIGNS, INC., a [Doc. 282] Delaware corporation, — . Defendant. 18 19 Presently before the Court is Defendant Pacific Surf Designs, Inc.’s (“PSD” or “Defendant”) renewed motion for attorneys’ fees pursuant. to U.S.C. § 285, U.S. 22 || 1927, and the Court’s inherent power. (Doc. No. 282.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.