Lane
Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARY ELIZABETH LANE, Case No.: 18-cv-2407-WQH-NLS
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
14 Defendant. 15 HAYES, Judge: The matters before the Court are the Motion for Summary Judgment and Remand filed by Plaintiff Mary Elizabeth Lane (ECF Nos. 14, 15), the Cross Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security (ECF No. 17), and the Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 24) recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Remand and grant Defendant’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. The duties of the district court in connection with a report and recommendation of a magistrate judge are set forth in Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). The district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report . . . to which objection is made,” and “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in …