Langill

Langill v. Allstate Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20203:20-cv-00176California802 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD LANGILL and TRICIA Case No.: 3:20-cv-00176-LAB-AHG

LANGILL,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO Plaintiffs, CONTINUE EARLY NEUTRAL

EVALUATION AND CASE

v. MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY

15 OF CALIFORNIA, et al., [ECF No. 10] Defendants.

18 This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Continue the 19 Early Neutral Evaluation (ECF No. 10) currently set for April 3, 2020. 20 Parties seeking to continue an ENE must demonstrate good cause. ECF No. 6 at 4 21 (“An ENE may be rescheduled only upon a showing of good cause”); see also Fed. R. 22 Civ. P 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s 23 consent”). “Good cause” is a non-rigorous standard that has been construed broadly 24 across procedural and statutory contexts. Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc., 624 F.3d 25 1253, 1259 (9th Cir. 2010). The good cause standard focuses on the diligence of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.