Schutza

Schutza v. Union City Investments LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20203:19-cv-00986California5,182 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SCOTT SCHUTZA, Case No.: 19-cv-00986-AJB-WVG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S

UNION CITY INVESTMENTS LLC, a COMPLAINT (Doc. No. 4) California Limited Liability Company; SHAWN LARKIN; and DOES 1-10, 16 Defendants. 17 Presently before the Court is Defendant Union City Investments LLC’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. 4.) The motion is joined by Defendant Shawn Larkin. (Doc. No. 10.) Plaintiff Scott Schutza (“Plaintiff”) opposed the motion. (Doc. No. 8). Defendant Union City Investments LLC filed a reply, which was also joined by Defendant Shawn Larkin. (Doc. Nos. 9–10.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND This case is an action alleging violations of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.