Parrish

Parrish v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 27, 20203:19-cv-01321California9,452 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERESA P., Case No.: 19cv1321-CAB(RBB)

Plaintiff,

REPORT AND

v. RECOMMENDATION REGARDING

CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of

JUDGMENT [ECF NOS. 11, 12]

Social Security, 15 Defendant.

17 On July 16, 2019, Plaintiff Teresa P.1 commenced this action against Defendant 18 Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, for judicial review under 42 U.S.C. 19 section 405(g) of a final adverse decision for social security benefits [ECF No. 1]. 20 Defendant filed the Administrative Record on September 20, 2019 [ECF No. 7]. On 21 October 25, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion for remand for payment of benefits or, in the 22 alternative, remand for further administrative proceedings [ECF No. 10]. The 23 Commissioner filed a cross-motion for summary judgment and an opposition to 24 25 26 1 The Court refers to Plaintiff using only her first name and last initial pursuant to the Court's Civil Local Rules. See S.D. Cal. Civ. R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.