Pelletier

Pacer Construction Holdings Corporation v. Pelletier

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 20203:19-cv-01263California1,874 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PACER CONSTRUCTION HOLDINGS Case No.: 19cv1263-MMA (BGS) CORPORATION,

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED

PETITION TO CONFIRM Petitioner, ARBITRATION AWARDS v. [Doc. No. 1] RICHARD PELLETIER; and RICHARD

PELLETIER HOLDINGS INC.,

15 Respondents. 17 On July 9, 2019, Petitioner Pacer Construction Holdings Corporation (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition against Respondents Richard Pelletier (“Pelletier”) and Richard Pelletier Holdings, Inc. (“RPHI”) (collectively, “Respondents”) to confirm two arbitration awards dated March 13, 2019 and May 22, 2019. See Doc. No. 1 (hereinafter “Petition”). Respondents’ brief in opposition to the Petition was due on or before February 20, 2020. See Doc. No. 17 at 11. To date, Respondents have not filed an opposition brief. The Court found the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. See Doc. No. 18. For the reasons set forth below, the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.