Dang

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH DANG d/b/a LAW OFFICE OF Case No.: 19cv1519 GPC(AHG) JOSEPH DANG, an individual,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT

Plaintiff, PONTIER’S MOTION TO DISMISS v. FOR FAILURE TO SERVE

COMPLAINT AND SUMMONS

DAVID PONTIER, an individual; 15 TEOCO Corporation Group Benefit Plan, [Dkt. No. 6.] a self funded group health plan; TEOCO Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; 17 UMR Inc., a Delaware Corporation; Glenn C. Nusbaum, an individual; Paul E. Kim, MD Inc., a California corporation; Kevin 19 Yoo, an individual, 20 Defendants.

22 Before the Court is Defendant David Pontier’s motion to dismiss the complaint for 23 failure to serve the complaint and summons. (Dkt. No. 6.) Plaintiff Joseph Dang filed an 24 opposition. (Dkt. No. 25.) No reply was filed. For the reasons stated below, the Court 25 DENIES David Pontier’s motion to dismiss. 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 Background On August 13, 2019, Plaintiff Joseph Dang d/b/a/ Law Office of…