The Children's Advocacy Institute v. Office of Refugee Resettlement, Administration for Children and Families

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20203:19-cv-00462California441 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THE CHILDREN’S ADVOCACY Case No.: 19-CV-462-GPC-BGS

INSTITUTE,

12

13 Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING JOINT

STIPULATION

14 v. 15 OFFICE OF REFUGEE (ECF No. 16.) 16

RESETTLEMENT,

17 ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, United States 18 Department of Health and Human 19 Services; UNITED STATES

IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS

20 ENFORCEMENT, United States 21 Department of Homeland Security;

UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND

22 BORDER PROTECTION, United 23 States Department of Homeland Security; UNITED STATES 24

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND

25 SECURITY,

26 Defendants. 27 1 On February 18, 2020, Plaintiff the Children’s Advocacy Institute and Defendants 2 || United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) and United States Customs 3 || and Border Protection (“CBP”’) (collectively “the Parties”) filed a joint stipulation and 4 || requested an order from the Court recognizing that stipulation. (ECF No. 16.) A district 5 || court may recognize stipulations submitted by the Parties in advance of trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.