Carpenter

Carpenter v. Petsmart, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20203:19-cv-01731California7,032 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TODD CARPENTER, individually on Case No.: 19-CV-1731-CAB-LL behalf of himself and others similarly 8 situated, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE ALLEGATIONS Plaintiff,

CONCERNING PROPOSED

10 v. NATIONWIDE CLASS

PETSMART, INC.,

[Doc. No. 12] Defendant. 13 14 This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s motion to strike allegations concerning a putative nationwide class. The motion has been fully briefed, and the Court deems it suitable for submission without oral argument. For the following reasons, the motion is granted. I. Background Plaintiff Todd Carpenter alleges that on December 24, 2018, he bought four All Living Things® Tiny Tales™ Small Pet Habitats (“Tiny Tales Homes”) at the Encinitas, California store of Defendant PetSmart, Inc. [Doc. No. 4 at ¶ 5.] Tiny Tales Homes are “artificial habitats or cages for pet hamsters, gerbils, and mice.” …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.