Securities and Exchange Commission v. Blockvest, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20203:18-cv-02287California1,700 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No.: 18CV2287-GPB(BLM)

COMMISSION,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

Plaintiff, RINGGOLD’S EX PARTE v. APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION

OF TIME TO FILE OPOSITION TO

BLOCKVEST, LLC and REGINALD SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION BUDDY RINGGOLD, III a/k/a RASOOL

ABDUL RAHIM EL, [Dkt. No. 103.] Defendants. 18 Before the Court is pro se Defendant Ringgold’s ex parte application for extension of time to file opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 103.) Plaintiff filed an opposition on February 27, 2020. (Dkt. No. 105.) Background On October 3, 2018, Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint against Defendants Blockvest, LLC and Reginald Buddy Ringgold, III a/k/a Rasool Abdul Rahim El alleging violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.