Castro

Castro v. Classy, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20203:19-cv-02246California5,888 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 BRITTANY CASTRO, Case No.: 3:19-cv-02246-H-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO

v. DISMISS

CLASSY, INC., a California corporation; [Doc. Nos. 19, 20, 21, and 22.] ADAM AARONS, an individual; DINA 17 RULLI, an individual; SONJA ZIVIC, an

individual, and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Defendants. 20 On November 25, 2019, Plaintiff Brittany Castro, commenced this civil action against Defendants Classy, Inc., Adam Aarons, Dina Rulli, and Sonja Zivic (Defendants) alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, U.S.C. 12101, et seq. (“ADA”), California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), and a variety of other state law causes of action. (Doc. No. 1.)1 On December 17, 2019, Defendants filed a 26 27 28 1 The Court retains the right to dismiss the state law causes of action at a later time if it motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 6.) On January 7, 2020, Plaintiff filed the amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.