Henle
Wholesale Sports, Inc. v. Henle
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
FILED
FEB: 2 2020
Sten EPCS EN : ¢ . 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA iol} || WHOLESALE SPORTS, INC., Case No.: 18cv1341-LAB(KSC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 13 || v. . -REQUESTS TO RE-OPEN FACT - DISCOVERY AND RE-OPEN THE || ANDREW HENLE; LES SPORTS DEADLINE FOR AMENDING THE
Defendants. [Doc. No. 35,| 17 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS. 19 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Opposed Motion Regarding Plaintiffs Request to Amend the Scheduling Order. [Doc. No. 35.] In the Joint Motion, plaintiff seeks an order re-opening fact discovery and re-opening the time for amending the □ pleadings. Plaintiffs reason for the request is discovery of “new evidence” believed to necessitate depositions of percipient witnesses and amendments to the Complaint. [Doc. No. 35, at p. 2.] Defendants…