Campos-Eibeck

Campos-Eibeck v. C R Bard Incorporated

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 20203:19-cv-02026California3,550 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 Case No.: 19cv2026-W(BLM) CATALINA CAMPOS-EIBECK,

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO COMPEL FOR AN ORDER

v. ALLOWING PLAINTIFF TO SERVE

ADDITIONAL GENERAL DISCOVERY

C R BARD INCORPORATED AND BARD

ON DEFENDANTS

PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED,

14 Defendants. [ECF No. 21]

16 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff's January 14, 2020 motion to compel [ECF No. 21 "MTC"], Defendant's January 21, 2020 opposition to the motion [ECF No. 25 ("Oppo.")], and Plaintiff's January 28, 2020 reply [ECF No. 26 ("Reply")]. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND This matter was originally part of a multidistrict litigation proceeding ("MDL") in the District of Arizona and was transferred to this Court on October 22, 2019. See ECF No. 4. The MDL involved personal injury cases alleging that defects in various models of Defendants’ inferior 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.