Currier

Currier v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20203:20-cv-00227California1,214 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD SCOTT CURRIER Case No.: 20cv227-LAB (JLB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS; AND

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA,

et al. ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF Defendants. TO FILE AMENDED

COMPLAINT

18 Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank removed this action from state court on February 6, 2020, citing federal question jurisdiction. One of Plaintiff Richard Currier’s claims arises under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). On February 10, the Court ordered Currier, by March 10, 2020, to file an amended complaint that complies with federal pleading standards. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(c). The Court pointed out that because Currier did not file his complaint in federal court originally, it wasn’t surprising that his complaint did not attempt to comply with federal pleading standards. Nevertheless, the complaint does not comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.