Brown

Brown v. Olsen

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20203:20-cv-00393California497 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS BROWN Case No.: 20cv393-LAB (MSB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING

v. COMPLAINT

MARY-KATE OLSEN and

ASHLEY OLSEN,

15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Curtis Brown, pro se, filed a short complaint along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). The Court need not rule on the IFP motion at this time because it is clear the complaint must be dismissed. The complaint identifies Brown as an “unstable” homeless person who lives in Chicago. It accuses Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen, actresses who appeared in the television show Full House, of harassing him, says he wants nothing to do with them, and asks for “retribution.” The complaint also says “(refer to the complaint),” apparently asking the Court to look at a different document, which Brown did not file. The complaint does not include the “short and plain statement of the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(1) requires. Nor…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.