Hammler

Hammler v. Hernandez

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20203:18-cv-00259California674 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALLEN HAMMLER, Case No.: 18cv259-CAB-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE “OBJECTION TO EXPERTS” [Doc. No. 50] J. HERNANDEZ, et al., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Allen Hammler (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed his complaint on February 2, 2018, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983. This case is currently proceeding on Plaintiff’s claim that Defendants retaliated against him in violation of the First Amendment. On February 3, 2020, Plaintiff filed an “Objection to Experts,” which this Court has deemed a Daubert or in limine motion. [Doc. No. 51.] On February 18, 2020, Defendants filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s Objection. [Doc. No. 54.] Plaintiff did not file a reply. DISCUSSION In the Objection, Plaintiff objects to the two witnesses listed in Defendants’ Disclosure of Expert Witnesses, J. Martinez and E.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.