Wiener

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TATTERSALLS LTD., Case No.: 3:17-cv-1125-BTM-

KSC

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

GERALD WIENER, et al.,

ADJUDICATION AND PARTIAL

Defendants. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

16 [ECF Nos. 90, 161] 17 On January 13, 2020, the Court heard oral argument on Plaintiff’s motion for summary adjudication and partial summary judgment against Defendants Gerald Wiener and Finance California Inc. (ECF No. 90 (“Mot.”)). Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED. I. STANDARD Summary judgment is appropriate under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure if the moving party demonstrates the absence of a genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986). A fact is material when, under the governing substantive law, it could affect the outcome of the case. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, 28 …