Pimentel

Pimentel v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20203:19-cv-00112California413 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL P., Case No.: 19-CV-112-AJB-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. Social Security, No. 22); Defendant. 16 (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, (Doc. No. 19); AND

(3) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY

20 JUDGMENT, (Doc. No. 20).

Presently before the Court are (1) Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, (Doc. No. 19), and (2) Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment, (Doc. No. 20). The Court referred this matter to Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo for a Report and Recommendation (the “R&R”), which was issued on February 11, 2020. (Doc. No. 22.) The Magistrate Judge recommends “Plaintiff’s MSJ be DENIED and that Defendant’s Cross-MSJ be GRANTED.” (Id. at 10.) The parties were instructed to file written 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.