Pimentel
Pimentel v. Berryhill
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL P., Case No.: 19-CV-112-AJB-WVG
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) ADOPTING THE REPORT ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of AND RECOMMENDATION (Doc. Social Security, No. 22); Defendant. 16 (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, (Doc. No. 19); AND
(3) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY
20 JUDGMENT, (Doc. No. 20).
Presently before the Court are (1) Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, (Doc. No. 19), and (2) Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment, (Doc. No. 20). The Court referred this matter to Magistrate Judge William V. Gallo for a Report and Recommendation (the “R&R”), which was issued on February 11, 2020. (Doc. No. 22.) The Magistrate Judge recommends “Plaintiff’s MSJ be DENIED and that Defendant’s Cross-MSJ be GRANTED.” (Id. at 10.) The parties were instructed to file written 28 …