Reed
Reed v. Paramo
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MYCHAL ANDRA REED, Case No.: 18-CV-361 JLS (LL)
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
vs. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST TO REPLACE
DANIEL PARAMO, et al.,
MAGISTRATE (AND CLERK)
Defendants. (ECF No. 106) 16 17 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Mychal Andra Reed’s Request to Replace Magistrate (and Clerk) (“Mot.,” ECF No. 106). Plaintiff declines to “divulge his specific reasoning for said request,” although offers to “do so at this Court[’]s behest.” Id. at 1. He adds that his “only endeavor is to receive justice against defendants . . . and to be dealt with by an ‘impartial’ jurist who will . . . treat[ him] ‘fairly] in the process, minus bias/ prejudice.” Id. at 2. Although Plaintiff does not specify whether he brings his Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 144 or 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), his Motion fails under either standard because he fails to present any “facts” from which a “reasonable person”…