Calderon-Jimenez

Calderon-Jimenez v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20203:16-cv-01798California1,633 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PABLO CALDERON-JIMENEZ, Criminal Case No.: 13cr2467-JAH Civil Case No.: 16cv1798-JAH Petitioner, v. ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

OR CORRECT SENTENCE

Respondent. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. No. 97). 16 17 INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner Pablo Calderon-Jimenez’s (“Petitioner”) pro se motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Doc. No. 97. Petitioner’s motion has been fully briefed. See Doc. No. 99. Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings, this Court may dismiss a § 2255 motion if it “plainly appears” from the motion, attached exhibits, and the record of prior proceedings, that a petitioner is not entitled to relief. See Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings; see also United States v. Blaylock, 20 F.3d 1458, 1465 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.