United States v. RAJMP, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20203:17-cv-00515California1,025 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No.: 17-CV-515-AJB-WVG

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE

ORDER

RAJMP, INC., et al., Defendants. 16 On January 31, 2020, this Court convened a discovery conference concerning, in part, the dispute that gave rise to Defendant RAJMP, Inc.’s (“RAJMP”) instant Motion for Protective Order. On February 12, 2020, RAJMP filed the Motion for Protective Order. (Doc. No. 214.) On February 19, 2020, the Government filed its Opposition to the Motion for Protective Order. (Doc. No. 220.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES the Motion without prejudice in its entirety. In its Motion, RAJMP articulates two requests for this Court’s consideration. First, RAJMP moves this Court to bar the Government from asserting 5 U.S.C. section 301 (“Housekeeping Statute”) for any purpose, including, but not limited to, the issuance of testimonial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.