Currier

Currier v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA

Bad Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20203:20-cv-00227California661 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD SCOTT CURRIER Case No.: 20cv227-LAB (JLB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA, et al. 15 Defendants.

17 On March 2, the Court issued an order denying Plaintiff Richard Currier’s two motions to proceed in forma pauperis, certifying that his interlocutory appeal was not taken in good faith, and ordering Currier to continue litigating this case. Specifically, Currier was required to file an amended complaint that complies with federal pleading standards. The order sua sponte extended the deadline for him to do that, to March 24, 2020. Currier has now submitted a document called “Notice of Filing a Proposed Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion [Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 403 and 201].” The Court has accepted this for filing as a motion for reconsideration of the March 2 order. The body of the document also identifies itself as some kind of motion or request.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.