Siegel
Siegel v. Neuschmid
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
□
“ O
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT... FERRET SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA“ — □□ 9 || JOSHUA SIEGEL, . Case No.: 18-cv-2493-WQH-BGS Petitioner, ORDER > 12 || . . || ROBERT NEUSCHMID: XAVIER BECERRA, The: Attorney General of the State of 15 || California, . fo Respondents. HAYES, Judge: □ . The matters before the Court are the Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Writ of 19 || Habeas Corpus as Untimely filed by Respondent Robert Neuschmid (ECF No. 6) and the Report and. Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge (ECF ‘No. 9) recommending 21 |! that the Court grant Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss. The duties of the district court in connection with a report and recommendation of a 23 || magistrate judge are set forth in Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 1US.C. § 636(b). The district judge must “make a de novo determination of those…