Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20203:19-cv-00829California1,179 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TRAVELERS PROPERTY Case No.: 19cv829-LAB (MDD)

CASUALTY COMPANY OF

12

AMERICA ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

13 STAY CASE Plaintiff,

14 v. [Docket numbers 9, 13.] 15

SEIRUS INNOVATIVE

16 ACCESSORIES, INC., et al. 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff Travelers Property Casualty Company of America filed this action, 20 seeking a declaration that it had no obligation to defend the Defendants in a 21 separate case, and requesting reimbursement for its expenses in voluntarily 22 defending them thus far. The other action is pending as case 19cv137-SI, 23 Columbia Sportswear North America v. Seirus et al. in the District of Oregon. 24 According to the complaint, this dispute began as a patent infringement 25 claim. According to allegations, Columbia argued that Seirus Heat Wave products 26 infringed one of Columbia’s patents, and filed suit in the Western District of 27 Washington.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.