Gustine

Gustine v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20203:19-cv-00903California2,727 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRENT EDWARD GUSTINE, Case No. 3:19-cv-00903-LAB-NLS

ORDER: (1) GRANTING IN PART

Plaintiff, AND DENYING IN PART

DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SAN

vs. DIEGO’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT; AND (2) GRANTING

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; EXTENSION OF TIME TO DOES 1 THROUGH 10, RESPOND TO ORDER TO SHOW Defendants. CAUSE

[ECF No. 19] 20 Plaintiff has brought this action under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 alleging that his constitutional rights were violated when he was housed at the San Diego Central Jail (“SDCJ”) in November of 2018. (See Second Am. Compl., ECF No. 10.) Defendant County of San Diego moves to dismiss all the claims in Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Def.’s Mot., ECF No. 19.) Plaintiff filed an Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.