McMorrow

McMorrow v. Mondelez International, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20203:17-cv-02327California5,670 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12 PATRICK MCMORROW, et al., Case No. 17-cv-2327-BAS-JLB 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER: (1) DENYING MOTION FOR

CLASS CERTIFICATION;

v. (2) GRANTING MOTION TO

EXCLUDE EXPERT

TESTIMONY OF J.

MONDELĒZ INTERNATIONAL, MICHAEL DENNIS; AND

INC.,

(3) GRANTING MOTION TO

EXCLUDE EXPERT

TESTIMONY OF COLIN Defendant. WEIR.

[ECF Nos. 70, 87, 90]

21 Plaintiffs Patrick McMorrow, Marco Ohlin, and Melody DiGregorio bring the instant putative class action against Defendant Mondelēz Global LLC.1 Defendant sells a line of belVita Breakfast Products and Plaintiff alleges Products’ labels are misleading. Plaintiffs now request this Court certify two classes. (“Mot.,” ECF No. 26 27 70-1.) Defendant opposes the Motion. (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 86.)2 The Court held oral argument on the motion on March 9, 2020. For the reasons detailed below,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.