Client Solutions Architects, LLC v. United States of America

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20203:19-cv-00123California5,008 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLIENT SOLUTIONS ARCHITECTS, Case No.: 19cv123-MMA (MSB) LLC; and THE HARTFORD,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY Plaintiffs, JUDGMENT v. [Doc. No. 25] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiffs Client Solutions Architects, LLC (“CSA”) and The Hartford (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this subrogation action asserting a claim for negligence against Defendant the United States of America (“Defendant”) under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq. See Doc. No. 1 (hereinafter “Compl.”). Defendant moves for summary judgment, arguing that Plaintiffs’ claim is time barred. See Doc. No. 25. Plaintiffs filed an opposition, to which Defendant replied. See Doc. Nos. 29, 32. The Court found the matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1.d.1. See Doc. No. 33. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s motion. / / / / / / …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.