McAleenan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AL OTRO LADO, INC., et al., Case No.: 17-cv-02366-BAS-KSC Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING

DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED

v. MOTION TO SEAL CHAD F. WOLF, et al., [ECF No. 340] Defendants. 16 On November 21, 2019, the Court denied four Motions to Seal various exhibits related to Plaintiff’s Motions for Preliminary Injunction and Provisional Class Certification. (ECF No. 332.) The Court permitted both parties to file amended motions “that more fully address the ‘compelling reasons’” to support sealing. (Id. at 9.) Consistent with this order, Defendants filed an Amended Motion to Seal (“Amended Motion”) 12 documents, the email addresses of CBP employees in these documents, and the portions of the parties’ briefs that rely on these documents. (Mem. of P. & A. in support of Am. Mot. (“Am. Mot.”) at 3–4, ECF No. 340-1.) On February 24, 2020, however, the Ninth Circuit denied a motion filed…