McMorrow
McMorrow v. Mondelez International, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 PATRICK MCMORROW, et al., Case No. 17-cv-2327-BAS-JLB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER: (1) DENYING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO EXCLUDE
v. THE EXPERT TESTIMONY
OF MICHAEL GREGER
(2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S
MONDELĒZ INTERNATIONAL, MOTION TO EXCLUDE
INC., THE EXPERT TESTIMONY
OF ROBERT H. LUSTIG
17 Defendant. [ECF Nos. 88, 89] 18 19 Presently before the Court is a tangled web of documents that collectively 20 forms the briefing for six different Daubert motions. Plaintiffs Patrick McMorrow, 21 Marco Ohlin, and Melody DiGregorio and Defendant Mondelēz Global LLC1 seek 22 to exclude the others’ expert witnesses. All motions are opposed, all have reply briefs 23 filed in support of them, and many of them are supported by exhibits attached to 24 “omnibus” declarations filed by both parties. The Court previously granted 25 Defendant’s motions to exclude the expert testimonies of J. Michael Dennis and of 26 27 1…