McMorrow

McMorrow v. Mondelez International, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20203:17-cv-02327California2,456 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 PATRICK MCMORROW, et al., Case No. 17-cv-2327-BAS-JLB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER: (1) DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO EXCLUDE

v. THE EXPERT TESTIMONY

OF MICHAEL GREGER

(2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MONDELĒZ INTERNATIONAL, MOTION TO EXCLUDE

INC., THE EXPERT TESTIMONY

OF ROBERT H. LUSTIG

17 Defendant. [ECF Nos. 88, 89] 18 19 Presently before the Court is a tangled web of documents that collectively 20 forms the briefing for six different Daubert motions. Plaintiffs Patrick McMorrow, 21 Marco Ohlin, and Melody DiGregorio and Defendant Mondelēz Global LLC1 seek 22 to exclude the others’ expert witnesses. All motions are opposed, all have reply briefs 23 filed in support of them, and many of them are supported by exhibits attached to 24 “omnibus” declarations filed by both parties. The Court previously granted 25 Defendant’s motions to exclude the expert testimonies of J. Michael Dennis and of 26 27 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.