Hastings
Hastings v. Ford Motor Company
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 DAVID HASTINGS, Case No. 19-cv-2217-BAS-MDD 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO AMEND
v. COMPLAINT
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., [ECF No. 16]
Defendants.
15 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff David Hastings’ Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint. (“Mot.,” ECF No. 16.) Defendants Ford Motor Company and Ford of Chula Vista filed an opposition to the Motion, (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 19), to which Plaintiff replied, (“Reply,” ECF No. 22). The Court finds this Motion suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument. Civ. L. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS the Motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed a complaint in California State Court asserting claims against Ford Motor Company for violation of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act, violation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, and fraud by omission. (ECF No. 1- 3.) The complaint also…