Turner

Turner v. Foss

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20203:19-cv-01878California1,219 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 |} TYRONE T. TURNER, Case No.: 3:19-cv-1878-GPC-RBM Petitioner, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR 13 || v. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL || TAMMY FOSS, Warden, Respondent.| [Doe. 13] . I. INTRODUCTION Petitioner Tyrone T. Turner (“Petitioner”), a prisoner proceeding pro per and in 19 || forma pauperis, filed an Ex Parte Request for Appointment of Counsel which this Court ||accepted for filing nunc pro tunc to February 3, 2020. (Doc. 13.)'! Liberally construing 21 || Petitioner’s filing, it is construed as a Motion for Appointment of Counsel (“Motion”). 22 23. || ———_______-_- Petitioner is admonished to abide by the rules of this Court when filing. Petitioner’s filing contained 25 || the following discrepancies: (1) lacking memorandum of points and authorities in support as a separate document; and (2) missing time and date on motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.