Moriarty

Moriarty v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20203:17-cv-01154California982 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELLE MORIARTY, et al. Case No.: 17cv1154-LAB (AGS)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. LEAVE TO FILE UNTIMELY

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

PLEADINGS

Defendant. 16 Defendant Dr. Lissaur was named as a Defendant in the first amended complaint, and filed his answer on May 2, 2018, and nothing of substance after that. The pretrial motion deadline has been extended several times, but it finally expired on February 25, 2019. Before the deadline passed, Plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend the first amended complaint (“FAC”) to add four Defendants in place of Doe Defendants, and Defendants Dale Weidenthaler and Amanda Daniels both filed motions for summary judgment motions. On September 24, 2019, the Court ruled on all three remaining pending motions in a substantial combined order. In November the parties began making their pretrial disclosures and Magistrate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.