Camp
Camp v. Qualcomm Incorporated
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 Carey Camp, Individually and on Behalf Case No.: 18-cv-1208-AJB-BLM of All Others Similarly Situated,
ORDER:
Plaintiff, 11 v. GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’
Qualcomm Inc., Steven K. Mollenkopf, MOTION TO DISMISS THE and George S. Davis,
CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS
Defendants. ACTION COMPLAINT 15 (Doc. No. 57)
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss the consolidated amended class action complaint. (Doc. No. 57.) Plaintiff opposes the motion. (Doc. No. 63.) For the reasons set forth more fully below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff represents a class of those who purchased Qualcomm stock between January 31, 2018, and March 12, 2018 and who are suing under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. (Doc. No. 50 at 4.) Qualcomm is a United States wireless technology…