Carter Pool v. Ameripark, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20203:19-cv-01103California2,175 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARTER POOL Case No.: 19cv1103-LAB (WVG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. REMAND; AND

AMERIPARK, LLC

ORDER REQUIRING

Defendant. DEFENDANT TO FILE

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

17 Plaintiff Carter Pool filed this putative wage and hour class action in California state court on behalf of himself and a class of 616 to 6851 parking valets employed by AmeriPark. Plaintiff’s Complaint alleges (1) failure to provide rest periods; (2) failure to provide accurate itemized wage statements; (3) failure to timely pay all wages due upon separation of employment; (4) failure to indemnify necessary business expenses; (5) violation of Business & Professions Code §§17200, et seq.; (6) wrongful constructive termination; (7) unlawful retaliation; and violation of the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA). 26 27 1 AmeriPark claims there are 616 putative class members, while Pool sets…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.