Omidi
Omidi v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MOJDEH OMIDI and AURORA Case No.: 14cv00857 JAH-BLM TELLERIA, individually and on behalf of 12 others similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS IN PART Plaintiff, [Doc. Nos. 48, 49] 14 v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC., A
Delaware corporation, et. al., Defendant. 18 Pending before the Court are Defendant FirstSight Vision Services’ motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 48) and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.’s motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 49). Plaintiffs oppose the motions. After a thorough review of the parties’ submissions and for the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motions in part. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs originally filed a class action complaint in Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego on November 5, 2013. Defendant Wal-Mart removed the action to federal court on April 9, 2014. Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on…