Verdun

Verdun v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20203:19-cv-00839California3,043 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE VERDUN; IAN ANOUSH Case No.: 3:19-cv-00839-AJB-WVG GOLKAR, on behalf of themselves and a 12 class of all others similarly situated., ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ Plaintiffs,

MOTION TO DISMISS

14 v. 15 CITY OF SAN DIEGO; SAN DIEGO (Doc. No. 6) POLICE DEPARTMENT; Does 1-130, inclusive 17 Defendants. 18 19 Presently before the Court is Defendants City of San Diego and San Diego Police Department’s (“Defendants”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Andre Verdun and Ian Anoush Golkar’s (“Plaintiffs”) complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. No. 6.) Plaintiffs oppose the motion. (Doc. No. 12.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion. BACKGROUND This dispute centers on law enforcement’s practice of marking the tires of parked vehicles with chalk to determine whether the vehicle has overstayed the time limit of city-…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.