Currier

Currier v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20203:20-cv-00227California873 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD SCOTT CURRIER Case No.: 20cv227-LAB (JLB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING REQUESTS

v. FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA, et al. 15 Defendants.

Since the Court directed Plaintiff Richard Currier to file an amended complaint, he has submitted four substantial documents asking the Court to take judicial notice. The Court on March 5 construed his first motion as a motion for reconsideration, and denied the request. The order explained that Currier had not been asked to produce evidence, and that “asking the Court to take judicial notice of documents is not a substitute for filing a complaint that meets federal pleading standards.” (Docket no. 12 at 2:9–11.) After that, Currier submitted three more documents asking for judicial notice. Judicial notice is unnecessary for reasons the Court has already explained. Furthermore, most of the documents are not appropriate for judicial notice. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.