Currier

Currier v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20203:20-cv-00227California468 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD SCOTT CURRIER Case No.: 20cv227-LAB (JLB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES

v. TO CONTINUE LITIGATING;

AND

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA,

et al. ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO Defendants. AMEND

17 Plaintiff Richard Currier filed a notice of appeal (Docket no. 25), which does not provide the issues appealed or explain the basis for appeal. Currier did not pay the filing fee and has not moved to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. Because he used the case number of his existing appeal, it appears he is attempting to file this as part of the same case on appeal, rather than as a new appeal. Based on the date provided in the notice of appeal, Currier is seeking review of the Court’s March 5 order denying his motion for reconsideration. Ordinarily a notice of appeal deprives the Court of jurisdiction over the matter appealed. But a notice of appeal from a non-final, non-appealable order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.