Amaraut

Amaraut v. Sprint/United Management Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20203:19-cv-00411California10,963 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VLADIMIR AMARAUT, on behalf of Case No.: 3:19-cv-411-WQH-AHG himself and all others similarly situated, 12 et al., ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ Plaintiffs,

MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

14 v. [ECF No. 64]

SPRINT/UNITED MANAGEMENT

COMPANY, Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 Before the Court is Plaintiffs Vladimir Amaraut, Katherine Almonte, Corbin Beltz, Kristopher Fox, Dylan McCollum, and Quinn Myers’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Sanctions and Corrective Measures pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 11 and 16 and Local Rule 83.1. ECF No. 64. This matter was referred to the undersigned by District Judge William Q. Hayes. ECF No. 86. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiffs’ motion. I. BACKGROUND On November 1, 2019, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Collective and Class Action Complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.