Collier
Collier v. State of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 KAI COLLIER, Case No. 19-cv-1599-BAS-RBM 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO STAY
PROCEEDINGS
v. [ECF No. 21] STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.
Defendants.
16 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Kai Collier and Defendants J. Romero, J. Huerta, and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings and Modify the Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 21.) Due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the parties’ attorneys are having difficulty complying with the scheduling order. Counsel are unable to go into the office to work and are attempting to work remotely. Defendants’ counsel also is experiencing delays obtaining documents and information from CDCR. Accordingly, the parties move to stay all deadlines in the scheduling order. A scheduling order may be modified only upon a showing of good cause and by leave of Court. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4); Johnson v. Mammoth…