Amezquita

Amezquita v. Hough

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20203:19-cv-01461California881 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

□

.

eff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA .

|| JOSE G. AMEZQUITA, Case No.: 19cv1461-AJB(KSC) _ Plant, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 13 || Vv. . MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF |] CORRECTIONAL OFFICER COUNSEL is. D. HOUGH, etal, [Doe. No. 13,

. Defendants. fo 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (IFP) in this civil rights action 19 || filed pursuant to Title 42, United State Code, Section 1983, alleging defendants violated ||his constitutional rights under the Eighth Amendment when they deliberately failedto 21 || protect him from a substantial risk of serious harm. [Doc. No. 1.] Before the Court is 22. plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel. [Doc. No. 13.] Discussion In his Motion, plaintiff requests that the Court appoint counsel in this case, because ||he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.