Porter

Porter v. Gore

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20203:18-cv-01221California3,476 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUSAN PORTER, Case No.: 18cv1221-GPC-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. TO COMPEL DEFENDANT

STANLEY

WILLIAM D. GORE, Sheriff of San

Diego County, in his official capacity; [ECF No. 56] WARREN STANLEY, Commissioner of California Highway Patrol, in his official capacity, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendant Stanley (“MTC”) [ECF No. 56] and Defendant Stanley’s Opposition (“Oppo.”) [ECF No. 58]. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel is DENIED. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL AND DISCOVERY BACKGROUND Plaintiff, Ms. Susan Porter, served on Defendant Stanley, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the California Highway Patrol (hereinafter “CHP”), multiple discovery requests that are at issue in the instant motion. Specifically, Plaintiff moves to compel further responses…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.