Moriarty

Moriarty v. American General Life Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20203:17-cv-01709California1,740 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

25 In September 2012, Bayside, an insurance brokerage firm, procured a term 26 life insurance policy for the decedent, Heron D. Moriarty (“Mr. Moriarty”), with 27 American General Life Insurance Company (American General). (ECF No. 18 28 (“FAC”), ¶ 15; MSJ, 5:12–13; id. at Exh. 3, 94:6–23.) Mr. Moriarty had an automatic payment schedule set up with American General for his premium payments. (MSJ, 6:11–12; id. at Exh. 3, 95:10–17, 97:3–5.) On the 20th day of each month, American General would deduct the monthly premium from his bank account. (MSJ, 6:11–12; id. at Exh. 3, 95:10–17, 97:3–5.) On March 24, 2016, American General was unable to process Mr. Moriarty’s automatic monthly payment because the associated bank account had been closed. (FAC ¶ 27; MSJ, 6:14–19.) On April 25, 2016, Plaintiff, Mr. Moriarty’s wife, emailed Bayside agent Jiman Kim the following: “Hello! Can you please give me the information on our life insurance. I need to pay it before it expires. I didn’t realize it was connected to an account we closed.” (MSJ, Exh. 7.) Mr. Kim responded the next day explaining he was “trying to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.