Kuhlken

Kuhlken v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20203:16-cv-02504California467 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PAMELA FOX KUHLKEN, Case No.: 3:16-CV-2504-CAB-DHB

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. TO RETAX COSTS

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO SHERIFFS DEPUTY D. SMITH [Doc. No. 45] 14 (Id # 1024) and DOES 1-5, 15 Defendants. 16 17 On January 16, 2018, the Court granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 32], and the Clerk of Court entered judgment in favor of Defendants [Doc. No. 33]. On January 30, 3018, Defendants filed a Bill of Costs totaling $5,147.90 [Doc. No. 34], and a hearing was set for February 16, 2018 [Doc. No. 35]. On February 5, 2018, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the Ninth Circuit [Doc. No. 36], but at no point did she file a response or opposition to the Bill of Costs. As a result of the lack of opposition from Plaintiff, the hearing was vacated, and on February 16, 2018, the Clerk of Court entered an order taxing costs of $5,122.90. [Doc. No. 41.] The Clerk’s order called attention to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.