McKnight

McKnight v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20203:19-cv-00272California8,045 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELE M., Case No.: 19-cv-00272-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANDREW SAUL, Acting Commissioner

of Social Security,1 15 Defendant. 16 [ECF Nos. 14; 18] 17 On February 6, 2019, Plaintiff Michele M. filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) seeking judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) denying her applications for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits and for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). (ECF No. 1.) Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and the Commissioner’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF Nos. 14; 18.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, DENIES the Commissioner’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, reverses the decision 26 27 Andrew Saul is hereby substituted as the defendant in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.