Rodriguez

Rodriguez v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20203:19-cv-00424California925 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 JULIE RODRIGUEZ, Case No.: 19cv0424-L-MDD

Plaintiff, ORDER ON JOINT MOTION v. FOR DETERMINATION OF

DISCOVERY DISPUTE:

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO Defendants. COMPEL PLAINTIFF’S

DEPOSITION AND FOR

MONETARY SANCTIONS

17 [ECF No. 20] 18 Before the Court is the Joint Motion of the parties for determination of a discovery dispute filed on March 16, 2020. (ECF No. 20). The Joint Motion presents the Defendants’ motion to compel Plaintiff’s deposition and seeks reimbursement of costs for two aborted depositions of Plaintiff. LEGAL STANDARD Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(1) provides that a party may take the deposition of any person, including a party, by reasonable notice. A party whose deposition has been noticed may seek a protective order under Rule 26(c). Absent a protective order or an order staying the deposition, the party…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.