Pashuta

Pashuta v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20203:19-cv-02386California2,504 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOUGLAS PASHUTA, Case No.: 3:19-CV-2386-CAB-(BLM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

CITY OF SAN DIEGO et al.,

COMPLAINT

Defendants. [Doc. No. 11]

17 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s First 18 Amended Complaint. [Doc. No. 11.] For the reasons set forth below, the motion is

GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

PLAINTIFF’S ALLEGATIONS

21 On April 2, 2019, Pashuta was in the lobby of the Embassy Hotel on Park 22 Boulevard in San Diego. Experiencing a mental crisis, Pashuta believed himself to be 23 invisible and was bathing in the hotel lobby’s drinking fountain. Pashuta was not 24 behaving aggressively or violently in any way. [Doc. No. 9, ¶12.] 25 After the hotel manager called police to report Pashuta’s behavior, Dabbaghian 26 arrived and confronted Pashuta. [Doc. No. 9, ¶13.] 27 28 Dabbaghian demanded Pashuta’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.