Sandoval
Sandoval v. Guldseth
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 Case No.: 19-cv-1584-BAS-RBB ALBERTO SANDOVAL,
CDCR # AM-0186,
ORDER DIRECTING U.S. Plaintiff, MARSHAL TO EFFECT SERVICE OF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT v. UPON DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) AND Fed. R. DAVID GULDSETH, M.D. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) ROMAN B. CHAM, M.D., Defendants. 17 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). (ECF No. 8.) Having conducted the sua sponte screening required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and § 1915A, the Court finds that the FAC sufficiently states claims for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and directs service of the FAC on Defendants. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On August 23, 2019, Alberto Sandoval (“Plaintiff”), incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See ECF…